400/426 Stroker. Ever heard of one?
This crank pictures in post #65 @ the 6 second mark, is that the one that was used. Cut down from 2.375 to 2.200 sure, but that's no offset grind going on there. 6.700 rod, 1.485 compression distance and a stock stroke of 3.380 /2= 1.690 for a total of 9.870. 9.9980 stock deck height would yield a piston .110 below the surface, more likely than the factory being out of wack 100 thou. on their deck height. Just my observation, could be wrong. opinions may vary.
.
This crank pictures in post #65 @ the 6 second mark, is that the one that was used. Cut down from 2.375 to 2.200 sure, but that's no offset grind going on there. 6.700 rod, 1.485 compression distance and a stock stroke of 3.380 /2= 1.690 for a total of 9.870. 9.9980 stock deck height would yield a piston .110 below the surface, more likely than the factory being out of wack 100 thou. on their deck height. Just my observation, could be wrong. opinions may vary.
.
Cranks I've offset ground are verry obvious the journal has shifted.
