I’m saying it about Joe because people that don’t know should know and they should be helping him.
Just like taking an engine to Nicks garage.
If you want to change a jet and move the timing up and down Nick is the guy.
If you want to test and sort things out Nick would be wasting your time.
RIGHT.
Because Joe didn’t use the same headers, ignition, fuel system and I doubt the same coolant temp.
And you wonder where the power went.
I’m TELLING you where it went and for some reason you refuse to accept the truth.
I don’t need to speculate.
His time slip is a joke.
Not because the dyno was bad, but because his testing on the dyno was wrong and his chassis tuning is suspect.
I’d say in that chassis with that tune that’s what it makes.
It is hilarious that racers thing they are tuners.
I have found that a full 80% of the guys at the track can’t tune.
I watched a guy with a very fast Nova kill his ET and MPH because his chassis was so far off.
How many guys at the...
I already answered this Tim.
I’ve watched Joe’s videos of his stuff on the dyno. I know what they are doing I wouldn’t do.
You refuse to grasp what the numbers say coming off the dyno.
The issue with his engine is the bad testing protocol they use.
That’s not a dyno issue. The operator needs...
Not at all. It doesn’t invalidate a thing.
Just like the numbers you get at the track from spring to the dog days of summer.
Does your stuff run the same MPH at 60 degrees as it does at 98 degrees?
If not then your track numbers are bogus and you are wasting your time.
You are not the only one. The guys who run a dyno or guts like TT5.9 who have been doing dyno testing for years and decades and know what the dyno is and what it can and can’t do all understood it just like you.
No one is saying the power is gone.
Do you understand what I said about correction factors?
Did Joe publish the observed (uncorrected) power numbers AND the weather conditions?
I didn’t watch the whole video but I’m sure he didn’t. And I’m guessing he doesn’t know himself.
I’m not dyno...