serious question about the world

-
No rocket going into space leaves the ground at 25,000 mph.

Escape velocity is just the theoretical speed at which an object would need to instantaneously accelerate to in order to escape gravity without any additional energy. It is not the speed required to get into space.

And in this case, where the earth stops instantly, then the effect on "flinging you forward" is instant, which is instant acceleration, or as close as you're going to get. So, no, 1000 Mph is not enough, right?
 
Really? Im confused.
Maybe this will help.
 
That is true no rocket leaves the launching pad at 25,000 mph but it does accelerate as it is moving away from the earth. As the atmosphere deminishes and the vacuum of space is reached there is no air resistance then you just need sufficient speed and acceleration to escape gravity. For example the space shuttle when positioned strategically around the earth and circumnavigating it can travel around the entire earth in 90 minutes. Id say that is damn fast probably up there around 18,000 mph or faster. Keep in mind that shuttle is still being held a set distance from the earth in an orbit. In other words gravity still has minimal hold. Food for thought. I’m in awe of the miracles and mysteries of space and astronomy.
 
No rocket going into space leaves the ground at 25,000 mph.

Escape velocity is just the theoretical speed at which an object would need to instantaneously accelerate to in order to escape gravity without any additional energy. It is not the speed required to get into space.

I did not say they did, it takes a speed of 25,000 Mph to escape the gravitational pull, not get into space. The shuttle, or any object in space, has to maintain a speed of around 17,500 Mph to reach equilibrium at the altitude it goes. Any faster and it flys further out, and slower and it starts falling. Go 25,000 and some change, and you're going bye bye....
 
Seriously thought how in the hell do I get my headlights to work on my space ship when I’m traveling just near the speed of light? I’m flying blind out here!
 
Seriously thought how in the hell do I get my headlights to work on my space ship when I’m traveling just near the speed of light? I’m flying blind out here!

While you're twiddling around with your carb going almost as fast as light, I'll just step through this wormhole and see you when you get there. :)
 
And in this case, where the earth stops instantly, then the effect on "flinging you forward" is instant, which is instant acceleration, or as close as you're going to get. So, no, 1000 Mph is not enough, right?
It is not enough to completely escape gravity which is why I said it would eventually pull you back down. However, it is enough to fling you 60 kilometers off the planet which is well past the edge of the stratosphere.
 
It is not enough to completely escape gravity which is why I said it would eventually pull you back down. However, it is enough to fling you 60 kilometers off the planet which is well past the edge of the stratosphere.
I see a Kerrrr- Spat coming??????????/
 
It is not enough to completely escape gravity which is why I said it would eventually pull you back down. However, it is enough to fling you 60 kilometers off the planet which is well past the edge of the stratosphere.

Nah, if the earth stopped instantaneously, the millions of ensuing tornadoes would catch you and toss you from tornado to tornado like a pin-ball game :)
 
It is not enough to completely escape gravity which is why I said it would eventually pull you back down. However, it is enough to fling you 60 kilometers off the planet which is well past the edge of the stratosphere.

The edge of space is around 62 miles, or 100 km
 
By now I'm sure the OP is quite impressed with all of us... if he's even around still .. lol...
 
Yes but where do the effects of earth's gravity end???????

treblig ( The "drunk" Science Guy))

That's a really interesting question, and not being a physicist, I'm just going to guess and say the effects themselves will reach on forever, it's to what degree the effects are felt would be the more appropriate question.
 
Wait, we're being sciency and stuff so I have to Hypothesize, not guess...
 
Yes but where do the effects of earth's gravity end???????

treblig ( The "drunk" Science Guy))
It extends as far away in light-years as the earth is old. And farther, if you include the various things that eventually coalesced into the earth.

So the earth’s gravitational field is approximately a sphere about 4.5 billion light-years in radius.
 
That's a really interesting question, and not being a physicist, I'm just going to guess and say the effects themselves will reach on forever, it's to what degree the effects are felt would be the more appropriate question.
Well............... you were close......The distance at which Earth's gravity is "zero" is dependent on the mass of the object that is trying to free itself from Earth's gravitational force. The greater the mass the further away the object must be. So, something "light" like a feather doesn't need to be nearly as far as something that weighs millions of tons.
Of course we're NOT taking into account the "orbiting" speed, which changes the equation completely!!!

Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation


It's all relative!!!!!!!!!
treblig (The Science Guy)
 
Last edited:
It extends as far away in light-years as the earth is old. And farther, if you include the various things that eventually coalesced into the earth.

So the earth’s gravitational field is approximately a sphere about 4.5 billion light-years in radius.

you're assuming gravity is limited by the speed of light.
Well............... you were close......The distance at which Earth's gravity is "zero" is dependent on the mass of the object that is trying to free itself from Earth's gravitational force. The greater the mass the further away the object must be. So, something "light" like a feather doesn't need to be nearly as far as something that weighes millions of tons.
Of course we're taking into account the "orbiting" speed, which changes the equation completely!!!


It's all relative!!!!!!!!!
treblig (The Science Guy)


I was not postulating how far away something could be to not fall back to earth, just that the effects are felt to the edge of the universe. Gravity is a force, without mass, so even though earth is 4.5 Bn years old, the gravitational effects would be theoretically measured, infinitesimally, out at the edge. Other objects with greater mass would mitigate some of the effects but the force itself, would be felt way farther than is measurable to us.
 
you're assuming gravity is limited by the speed of light.



I was not postulating how far away something could be to not fall back to earth, just that the effects are felt to the edge of the universe. Gravity is a force, without mass, so even though earth is 4.5 Bn years old, the gravitational effects would be theoretically measured, infinitesimally, out at the edge. Other objects with greater mass would mitigate some of the effects but the force itself, would be felt way farther than is measurable to us.
The gravitational force of an object can only be in existence for as long as the object has been in existence.

Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity shows that the speed of gravity cannot exceed the speed of light.
 
The gravitational force of an object can only be in existence for as long as the object has been in existence.

I wasn't saying the time of existence, I was suggesting the distance at which it is felt. The two are very different concepts.

Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity shows that the speed of gravity cannot exceed the speed of light.

You got me on this, and as such, my distance idea doesn't hold. :)
 
You would have to define 'felt' or feel. Felt by what? How large is (how much mass has the) object/observation point that 'feels' the gravity (mass) of the other object?
Does the object or observation point itself have mass, and therefore create its own gravity(-well)?
Without mass there's no gravity.
Gravity's curve is a parabolic curve, the further you get from the center of the gravity-source, the less it becomes (measurably/felt).
 
You would have to define 'felt' or feel. Felt by what? How large is (how much mass has the) object/observation point that 'feels' the gravity (mass) of the other object?
Does the object or observation point itself have mass, and therefore create its own gravity(-well)?
Without mass there's no gravity.
Gravity's curve is a parabolic curve, the further you get from the center of the gravity-source, the less it becomes (measurably/felt).

My thoughts were about how far the gravity of earth would be felt, no matter how infinitesimal in degree. It seemed that since gravity is a force, then speed would not affect it. That's wrong though since gravity is a waveform and matches the speed of light. So, as stated, it could only be theoretically felt, around 4.5Bn light years away at most.
 
My thoughts were about how far the gravity of earth would be felt, no matter how infinitesimal in degree. It seemed that since gravity is a force, then speed would not affect it. That's wrong though since gravity is a waveform and matches the speed of light. So, as stated, it could only be theoretically felt, around 4.5Bn light years away at most.
If you got that far away there would be no way to "report" your finding because it would take 4.5 billion years for the data to get back to earth????/ We would all be dead if the sun had not supernova-ed by then???Treblig (The Science Guy)
 
-
Back
Top