GEO
Sarcasm Inc.
That has to be the stupidest answer todayPositive, and then negative
That has to be the stupidest answer todayPositive, and then negative
Positive, and then negative
Don't knock it until you've tried it.Vegiterians make soy crap to look and taste like meat....
Just sayin.....
I LOVE gasoline powered muscle, but I have to admit I really like the electric movement too. It just shows hot rodding is gonna LIVE no matter what. Google Tesla powered Mercury. If you don't like that car, you got some problems. lol
Yeah, heard the same argument from AOC, but it was about cows farting in a field.
As far as I am concerned, the electric cars are pure bullshit, and here is why.
If these things can compete on a fair and level playingfield, without government subsidies, if one could "fill up the tank" in a matter of minutes such that the TIME investment is competitive with liquid hydrocarbons, if the disposal of the end of life parts is made abundantly clear, if the electrical grid were robust enough to support a HUGE hammering at around 5-9 pm that even a 5% of the population would put to it, if the population actually CONSIDERED where their magical unicorn rainbow fart dust electricity came from...
- The entire bullshit green industry, including electric cars are all heavily subsidized by the U.S. taxpayer.
- Electricity storage is nowhere near as portable or dense compared to liquid hydrocarbons, and will not be for a long time.
- The battery packs do wear out over time. What is going to be done with these dangerous and toxic things at the end of their life? Are we just going to be NIMBYs and send them off to China or India, so somebody else's kids get fucked up with those toxic things?
- The entire lifetime cost of these is hidden, I do not know what it is, that data is not readily available to me, and that tells me it is a LOT worse than those pushing these boondoggles want us to know.
As far as I'm concerned, it's a huge scam.
One simple answer: In order to support a magical "now we are all electric cars" world, and the coming increase, there simply is not enough lithium to do so. The recycle/ toxic/ pollution problems associated with lithium make current automotive pollution look like a hair in your soup
I have to wonder what the range would be when it is -30 outside and you have to run the heater at full power.
For
Electric
Cars
And
Liberals
FECAL
You will always have to drill for oil and gas. It will always need refining. Because: everything, including that "clean" electric car needs lubrication. More and more vehicle parts are being made from plastics. Actually, there will be even more use of plastics in the future. We still need fertilizers, asphalt, pharmaceuticals, rubber, paint, waxes, and all sorts of other chemicals. After you make all those compounds from the crude oil you're left with a bunch of other stuff. Stuff we burn as fuel. What are the oil companies going to do with all that fuel if it isn't going to get burned for transportation?
View attachment 1715423484
Cheapest long range-AWD one around here "used" is $50K. Your son did not pay anything close to $38K for his car. MSRP, before options, on Model 3 is $39490-$59990. Again, their advertising is very misleading. Plus the damn things are butt-ugly IMHO. https://www.cars.com/shopping/tesla-model_3-2019/Our son bought a tesla model 3 about a month and a half ago.
Dual motor option.
........
BTW the SRP on the model 3 is $38,000.
I'm curious too. Not that I'm shopping for one, but the Model 3 was hyped as this game changer that would let the average car buyer into the Tesla family. Because before that they were basically toys for rich people. They've obviously managed to get many more people into the market, but it seems you still have to be substantially more well heeled than the average new car buyer to afford one.What did he pay for it?
As someone who has views that can be categorized as conservative and some that would be called liberal, I just want to say cut this crap. We can handle disagreeing and debating so long as we remember that we're on the same team. Both "sides" have good points from time to time and we succeed by taking the best ideas from each.
I'll tell you what, Lipshitz....YOU can ask the site owner about becoming a Moderator. If that ever happens, THEN you can bark orders.
Until then, piss off with your "cut this crap" comments.
The thing that has always made me love cars is the interaction between the machine and the driver. The engine feels like a living, breathing thing with a beating heart. With an old hotrod, the engine and the driver are a team. Tuning, maintaining, and extracting the best possible performance requires that the driver is involved and engaged.
With electrics, the car doesn't even need you. It can do everything on its own. Electric cars have HUGE advantages which sucks almost all of the fun out of it. We now have sedans that any old granny can get in, push a couple of buttons and run a 10 second quarter mile. Literally. What the hell is the point?
They're undeniably cleaner, easier to maintain, cheaper to run, quicker to accelerate. I can't believe how little those advantages mean to me on an emotional level.
Don't knock it until you've tried it.
I tried one of those Impossible Whoppers...went back for a few more! They're damn near as good as the real thing! I like the idea of being able to eat a burger and not turn into a fat slob with cholesterol coming out of my nose. If it's easier on the environment, all the better.
I hope you're right...but it seems like it's easy enough to make everything with an electric motor do 0-60 in 3 seconds which doesn't leave much room for hotrodding. What's the point when the rolling jellybean (Tesla Model 3) can keep up with a Ferrari?
Check out how much pollution/energy consumption comes from that industry. Clean that mess up and we can go back driving to big block C Bodies to work every day. Between clearing trees for farm land to grow the feed, the land and energy to tend to them, the methane that comes out of their butts, the energy to refrigerate and transport meat...it's not sustainable on a planet with 7.5 billion people.
As far as I know, you're right on with some of your points here. My input is that you may be suffering from a lack of imagination and faith in human ingenuity.
These problems are solvable.
Yes. Batteries do lose performance with cycling. Internal resistance increases as they chemically break down with each cycle. That said, internal combustion engines deteriorate with use too. The rate of performance loss is probably pretty darned similar. 100k+ mile Teslas are showing ~90% of their battery performance is intact. The software minimizes the most abusive conditions for batteries (running too low, overheating, etc).
The waste from used-up batteries is a concern but the components of the batteries are largely recyclable. The lifetime cost has been analyzed over and over again...and electrics come out on top. Nearly zero maintenance, significantly lower cost per mile offsets the cost of the batteries, apparently.
Good point about the electrical grid but this can and will be upgraded as needed.
Electricity generation is definitely a source of pollution. The net production of pollution and CO2 emissions is still lower than having each car burn it's own fuel apparently. Plus, pollution can more easily be managed when it comes from one source. Electricity can be generated in part from renewable sources like solar, geothermal, hydro power...that diversity of sources is a huge plus. We're not reliant on OPEC or the system of refineries that just happen to have a fire or another reason to shut down when fuel prices are low.
As for taxpayer subsidies...I don't know about these. There is a tax break on purchasing them that doesn't apply to normal cars which is supposed to help get the tech off the ground. Is that what you mean? That won't last too much longer, I would guess.
Yeah. The supply of lithium is a bottleneck. There are a lot of people trying to come up with the next battery tech. The pollution associated with lithium are significant but have you seen what it takes to get aluminum out of the ground? Huge electrical consumption on top of the environmental damage from any kind of mining...
Good call. Range definitely takes a hit in the cold weather. This is a big problem but it's not exclusive to electrics. Internal combustion cars get worse mileage/range in the cold too. Denser air requires a more fuel to maintain the right mixture. Once the engine is totally warmed up, the difference isn't that big (and you can make more power thanks to the cold air) but a lot of extra gas is wasted in the mean time, never mind the raw fuel emissions that come from cars with cold catalytic converters.
As someone who has views that can be categorized as conservative and some that would be called liberal, I just want to say cut this crap. We can handle disagreeing and debating so long as we remember that we're on the same team. Both "sides" have good points from time to time and we succeed by taking the best ideas from each. Just my .02
Quite honestly, it never ceases to amaze me that an opinion is criticized for being an opinion, by another opinion when in fact the original opinion was a joke.The thing that has always made me love cars is the interaction between the machine and the driver. The engine feels like a living, breathing thing with a beating heart. With an old hotrod, the engine and the driver are a team. Tuning, maintaining, and extracting the best possible performance requires that the driver is involved and engaged.
With electrics, the car doesn't even need you. It can do everything on its own. Electric cars have HUGE advantages which sucks almost all of the fun out of it. We now have sedans that any old granny can get in, push a couple of buttons and run a 10 second quarter mile. Literally. What the hell is the point?
They're undeniably cleaner, easier to maintain, cheaper to run, quicker to accelerate. I can't believe how little those advantages mean to me on an emotional level.
Don't knock it until you've tried it.
I tried one of those Impossible Whoppers...went back for a few more! They're damn near as good as the real thing! I like the idea of being able to eat a burger and not turn into a fat slob with cholesterol coming out of my nose. If it's easier on the environment, all the better.
I hope you're right...but it seems like it's easy enough to make everything with an electric motor do 0-60 in 3 seconds which doesn't leave much room for hotrodding. What's the point when the rolling jellybean (Tesla Model 3) can keep up with a Ferrari?
Check out how much pollution/energy consumption comes from that industry. Clean that mess up and we can go back driving to big block C Bodies to work every day. Between clearing trees for farm land to grow the feed, the land and energy to tend to them, the methane that comes out of their butts, the energy to refrigerate and transport meat...it's not sustainable on a planet with 7.5 billion people.
As far as I know, you're right on with some of your points here. My input is that you may be suffering from a lack of imagination and faith in human ingenuity.
These problems are solvable.
Yes. Batteries do lose performance with cycling. Internal resistance increases as they chemically break down with each cycle. That said, internal combustion engines deteriorate with use too. The rate of performance loss is probably pretty darned similar. 100k+ mile Teslas are showing ~90% of their battery performance is intact. The software minimizes the most abusive conditions for batteries (running too low, overheating, etc).
The waste from used-up batteries is a concern but the components of the batteries are largely recyclable. The lifetime cost has been analyzed over and over again...and electrics come out on top. Nearly zero maintenance, significantly lower cost per mile offsets the cost of the batteries, apparently.
Good point about the electrical grid but this can and will be upgraded as needed.
Electricity generation is definitely a source of pollution. The net production of pollution and CO2 emissions is still lower than having each car burn it's own fuel apparently. Plus, pollution can more easily be managed when it comes from one source. Electricity can be generated in part from renewable sources like solar, geothermal, hydro power...that diversity of sources is a huge plus. We're not reliant on OPEC or the system of refineries that just happen to have a fire or another reason to shut down when fuel prices are low.
As for taxpayer subsidies...I don't know about these. There is a tax break on purchasing them that doesn't apply to normal cars which is supposed to help get the tech off the ground. Is that what you mean? That won't last too much longer, I would guess.
Yeah. The supply of lithium is a bottleneck. There are a lot of people trying to come up with the next battery tech. The pollution associated with lithium are significant but have you seen what it takes to get aluminum out of the ground? Huge electrical consumption on top of the environmental damage from any kind of mining...
Good call. Range definitely takes a hit in the cold weather. This is a big problem but it's not exclusive to electrics. Internal combustion cars get worse mileage/range in the cold too. Denser air requires a more fuel to maintain the right mixture. Once the engine is totally warmed up, the difference isn't that big (and you can make more power thanks to the cold air) but a lot of extra gas is wasted in the mean time, never mind the raw fuel emissions that come from cars with cold catalytic converters.
As someone who has views that can be categorized as conservative and some that would be called liberal, I just want to say cut this crap. We can handle disagreeing and debating so long as we remember that we're on the same team. Both "sides" have good points from time to time and we succeed by taking the best ideas from each. Just my .02
Quite honestly, it never ceases to amaze me that an opinion is criticized for being an opinion, by another opinion when in fact the original opinion was a joke.
LOLOLOL Do they take Makita batteries?I have avoided this thread -----simply not interested !!
LOLOLOL Do they take Makita batteries?
Believe it or not, the first amendment even applies to others.I see you’re the one who liked his furious, triggered response expressing his criticism of my opinion. What did you like about it?
Based on your post, it sounds like you felt sorry for him having his feelings hurt.
He also got my name wrong. Can anyone explain where that came from? Seems like a very specific guess.
Believe it or not, the first amendment even applies to others.
My sons freind took me for a ride in his Tesla. The quickest street car I was ever in. No noise.All you can hear is all four tires trying to grip. I was in a new Hellcat no comparison. My Duster wouldn't have stood a chance.
Never race a Tesla for cash on the street you will lose your money. It felt more like an amusement ride, The feeling in your gut from dead stop G-force is unbelievable.
The one I was in was an SUV. You have to drive one to appreciate the feel of the G-force. My first impression was that I was driving a golf cart. Once you stab that throttle its like nothing you ever experienced. Don't get me wrong I love the sound of a V8 with a large cam and loud exhaust. This Tesla was a different animal and a experience you all should have before you give an opinion. I would love one for a daily driver stop light to stop light in traffic. Sneaky and very quick.Can't hear a thing cricket, cricket, no sound no fun
Probably won't get the chance but I guess you never knowThe one I was in was an SUV. You have to drive one to appreciate the feel of the G-force. My first impression was that I was driving a golf cart. Once you stab that throttle its like nothing you ever experienced. Don't get me wrong I love the sound of a V8 with a large cam and loud exhaust. This Tesla was a different animal and a experience you all should have before you give an opinion. I would love one for a daily driver stop light to stop light in traffic. Sneaky and very quick.