Recent content by J-c-c

Yes, a physicist can calculate the needed angles, and speed to put a 1.62oz 1.68" diameter round ball with dimples into a 4.25" diameter hole maybe 100 yards away. Tiger Woods can put in the hole in less than 60 seconds.

Best to get a larger rock of pumice, it will float longer.

I thought the SeaLion was the community spokesperson here. I must not have gotten the memo putting you in charge, guess the WW3, name calling, "done", ignore, distortions, recollections of HS beatdowns, absurd arguments, etc, and now with everyone running away now is because you were having so...

How?

I know, I know, many are, now first take your blood take your blood pressure, then review Thread #145 for your answer, SealionDan will swoon you with LA LA land facts and figures ad infinitum until you slide past 1976, or whenever the last very unique A was built, and finally find the unwatch...

Everyone needs to get the last word in I see, for all those that I figuratively threaten, by all means ignore me, I'm honored.

I deserve no special consideration in the matter, thanks for asking.

Really, because I have read EVERY single reply here, and those (a Lot) that I have disagreed with, I voiced that disagreement. I have clearly stated my case at nearly every raised contention, and asked for an explanation often for those contentions that are unclear. It does not matter how many...

"In argumentation and informal logic, reductio ad absurdum (RAA) is a method of refuting a claim by extending the logic of the opponent's argument to a point of absurdity. Also known as the reductio argument and argumentum ad absurdum."

You know how those Chess geniuses that play against 6 opponents simultaneously, I feel I'm playing checkers against two tag teams of 12 members each. And you can't get blood out of a rock. :lol:

I assume that is a sincere invitation, so thank you. But based on my experience, they ultimately figuratively turn into rock throwing soap boxes where nobody is really listening or interested in another's perspective on any matter, and the primary objective is to rant and change everyone else's...

I can, but why play games here, you designed it, share it with us, and we can move on? I disagree with your premise that I have no idea what it should be for, and that is your useless assumption. So spill the beans.

Let's get it down to a more, word of the day, granular level to help sort out the confusion or whatever above..

I'm game, now please be specific in what is not clear that you read or I shared. Your major in college was? I was given an "A" in technical writing my sophomore year, but I might have lost a bit off my speedball in the decades since. So where were we, you are going to point out where I lose you...

Como?