Recent content by RAMM

If they're using a 3.58" stroke and these '302 variants the peak torque will be absolutely abysmal at about 1lb/ci. I would never go down this path ever again even if paid mega$$$$. Complete and utter underperformer the one I built turned out to be. J.Rob

Back in the day Vizard was a huge proponent of addressing "crevice volume" , meaning he did NOT agree with things like bore notching so I find this strange. The last engine i did this bore notching to--was in 2009 and I've never done it since. It does lose power in the double digits and it does...

318-349 stroker w/EZE-EFI J.Rob

I'm on page 8 of this train wreck for some reason and a 5.9 Magnum is the EASY button for this fella. If we're gonna help him this is what needs to be harped upon. J.Rob

Thanks it worked really well and I still have it. J.Rob

Mid 12's at best....been there done that. J.Rob

It is...thanks. J.Rob

I understand that and have done that....but I will flat out refuse and "Save them from themselves" They can go somewhere else and "in their minds save some shekels". J.Rob

1.42 tq/ci is pretty remarkable. Wow. J.Rob

Disagree here RRR. Ive had way too many unsatisfied customers with their 383 builds. J.Rob

Exactly! You do like @PRH says.....I'd push the customer to move to a 431 or even better the excellent 451. Ive done over 600hp in a solid flat tapped build with TF240,s OOTB. Oh and I think it made 590 tq @ 470 cubes. It's documented here somewhere. J.Rob

Thanks Triple R. J.Rob

Add 3-4% no mystery there. J.Rob

That 371 was the only engine that I took to UNOH that when fully loaded @ 2300rpm absolutely just hung there and sung as steady as the rock of Gibraltar. Every other engine I took struggled a little bit and the torque would fall off a touch under full low rpm load. The torque actually came up a...

Thats probably because the stock exhaust is kinda terrible--lol. J.Rob