360 head trip

I decided to crudely remove the ski jump on the valve, then a laid the straight wall/ssr back a tinge more and smoothed the sharp edges after the seat 'chamber side'

This picked up the lower lift some but a few cfm lost at the top due to turbulence at the top of the ssr: *these heads still need a valve job too*



-LIFT------------CFM
--------stock---bowl/ssr---guide/roof kink----valve mod/ssr/chamber trans
.100------55------56----+1-----55.3-----------------58--+3
.200------109-----111--+2-----111----+2-----------125--+16
.300------169-----176--+7-----176----+7-----------178--+9
.350------193-----198--+6-----198----+6-----------199--+6
.400------206-----213--+7-----213----+7-----------215--+9
.450------213-----221--+8-----224----+11----------236--+23
.500------208-----230--+22---235.3--+27.3--------237.4-+29.4
.550------204-----225--+21---240.7--+36.7--------235---+31 but lost 5cfm
.600------***-----***--***---243.2---+43----------235--same but lost 8cfm at this lift
Gains based on stock flow*
So in the total flow aspect I lost 6 cfm from the previous work BUT put the peak at lower/more usable street lift.

This wears my patience because I really just want to do the whole port already to my liking and be done with , but it's teeter teeter and check.

Next week I'll have the seat done, but the question is...do I wait to see the improvement the vj makes on the work done as to get a more accurate picture? or do I just keep moving along with improvements and giving the results?
What do you guys think?