Mechanical Fan VS Electric Fan

I would like to see some tests that support this statement. Apples to apples. In other words the electrical fans tested pulled the same volume of air that the clutch fan did.

Or another test would be to average the volume of air pulled and average the amount of HP required (over say 10 hours), since both thermo-clutch fan and electrical fans both do not pull consistent volumes of air.

If you move the same volume of air, how would there be less drag? You cannot do the same work and use less energy unless there is an efficiency increase right? An electrical fan scenario, you are turning the alternator which is like 70 - 80 % efficient, then running an electric motor that is similar in efficiency you have lost 40 % of your energy in the electrical process. Only if the electric fan blades were more efficient in ability would you gain some efficiency back. So, why not just put an equally efficient fan blade on the clutch and save 30 % of your used energy?

The only real way the electrical fan uses less energy is that they pull considerably less air, therefore using less rotational power at the alternator.

The test might have some validity if you were just testing the fans. Ultimately, what we are looking for is the efficiency of the cooling system.

The implied massive and equalizing load that you are talking about on the alternator would only be imposed by an electric fan of the same cfm rating working at the same rate as your beloved mechanical clutch fan. The rotational mass of the charging system remains constant. It's the imposed load that varies. With an electric fan, you reduce the the mass of the fan/clutch/pulley/belt/bolts/dust/six bugs/whatever from the engine. By default, the engine benefits from less rotational mass from the onset.

So, perhaps a better test would be to see how much airflow is required for your cooling system to operate efficiently and plan your fan set up from there?