Who has the fastest /6 here

That's an admirable trait, but the problem is, you have chosen one of the worst possible engines to try to do that with. The narrow (small) bore center spacing of a /6 hamstrings all efforts to try to put decent size valves in the motor, and the fact that the ports were designed for a 170 (and, they were) doesn't help any. The only engine I can think of that is a poorer choice for trying to go fast, normally aspirated, is a 144/170/200/250 Ford 6, with the integrally-cast, intake manifold.

well im on the last legs of figuring out the bore size issue.

then doing a head with 1.94/1.5 valves... and some fun ports...