Who has the fastest /6 here

That's an admirable trait, but the problem is, you have chosen one of the worst possible engines to try to do that with. The narrow (small) bore center spacing of a /6 hamstrings all efforts to try to put decent size valves in the motor, and the fact that the ports were designed for a 170 (and, they were) doesn't help any. The only engine I can think of that is a poorer choice for trying to go fast, normally aspirated, is a 144/170/200/250 Ford 6, with the integrally-cast, intake manifold.

By whose calculations? I'd like to see documentation to back that up. I don't doubt the slant head needs help, but with the right person behind a grinder and on the flow bench.......again, I'd like to see the data. I know someone who is approaching 200 CFM now at around .500 lift with a slant head with just conventional porting. That's flowin for a slant.

The "big" Ford 6 (240/300) has much larger valves, and can be fitted with Cleveland, welded-up, V8 cylinder heads (which have humongous valves,) if you don't like the stock head, and the 250/292 Chevy 6 is also another engine (which also has a 4" bore) and can accept large valves. It also can be fitted with the V8 cylinder heads, if you don't like the 6 head.

The phord valves can be fitted to the slant too.....but IMO they aren't needed. I think they are too much. Those 1.70/1.44 or the stock 318 valves are probably good for most anything. Remember the bore size here. It ain't real big.

The /6 can, with forced induction, run toe-to-toe, with either of these brand X engines, because of it's unusually strong infrastructure which allows LARGE amounts of boost to be used without damage to the reciprocating assembly, with 500+ HP fairly easily attainable, as evidenced by Ryan's and Tom Wolfe's cars on FABO.

Ed's not buildin a forced induction engine. So the point is kinda moot what a forced induction engine will do. That's comparin apples and oranges.

But, because of the lack of a really good breathing head (and, I'm not sure that's ever going to be possible, due to the close bore center spacing of the /6 block,) trying to build a normally aspirated /6 that has specific output numbers approaching 2 HP per cubic inch, or even 1.5, is like trying to run a marathon with your mouth sealed with a piece of duct tape.

Mark's car still amazes me... It's a rocket, for what it is!!! Love to watch it run...

Not sure I agree that a "good breathing head" cannot be accomplished using the confines of a stock head. I don't think enough people in the know have really tried yet. Sorta like the "real turbo" I keep waiting on someone to put on a slant. Ain't happened yet. Don't take any of this to mean I don't like forced induction. I do. It's great. But that's not what everybody's into.

I meant to say that's not what everybody's into that Ed is referring to.