THere was no case for negative feedback, Paul. Sorry friend, but you are wrong on this one. I would agree 100% if the "misrepresentation" was indeed intentional and malicious, but it is quite apparent neither was the case here. I am not certain that it was even misrepresented at all. The seller thought and believed 100% that the part that was shipped was new. Since he had no knowledge that it was not new, that blows the case for misrepresentation out of the water. Yall are a bunch of hard asses. I sure am glad I give stuff away and charge dirt cheap *** prices cause I'll be a sumbitch if people aren't gonna find something to ***** about no matter what. Merry frakkin christmas indeed.