340 X Head Valve Options

Hello FABO,

Getting ready to pull the heads off a 69 340 motor with stock original X Heads and I wanted to rebuild the heads to go back on the motor with a 400-425 HP street/strip target. I wanted to take my time, do it right, and employ all the tricks of the trade to get the most out of this motor. Had a few questions about valves, valve jobs, and eventually some street porting.

Let’s just start with valves


  1. Has anybody had any experience cutting a 30 Degree face angle like in the below Mopar Muscle article?
http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/engine/mopp_0001_360_engine_head_porting/index.html


Now, I know the stock tulip valves will not work, but I was considering changing the valves anyway to a flat head style with 5/16 guides like brand X guys use. The article says that you can only do this if you are changing the valve size, so if I go from a 2.02 to a 2.05 would that work? Also I plan on installing hardened seats so would that allow me to switch to the 30 degree angle?

11/32 +.100 over standard small block chevy valves are a common upgrade and the valves are cheap. The guides 'since already needing done' will be changed to a bronze press in style ..and NO u do not have to go bigger than the 2.02 head diameter u have now. As for the 30% seat angle , that is supposed to fatten the low lift numbers from actually giving more area between seat/valve at the same lift as a steeper 45* cut...but they say a 30* seat does not last...i think from the way it's hammered with a poorer cleaning ability in comparison to a 45*..so it go's away faster. something to google...i remember pontiac liked to use 30* cuts.lol

2. Assuming I could cut a 30 degree angle on the valve seat, what would be a good flat head style 5/16” stem valve? I would like to run a solid cam with adjustable 1.6 rockers and still fit under stock valve covers, so would I need a valve longer than the stock unit cut the stem to the same install height? I was thinking like something below:

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/PAR-8483/

Now I know changing from a tulip to a flathead valve will increase compression. Also the 5/16 stem would flow better than stock tulip 3/8 stem. Would there be any other advantage? And does anybody think for a 400 hp target is all this worry about the valves worth it? Or should I just get a traditional 3 angle job at 45 degrees and reuse the stock valves and get on with the next step in the build...

Thanks All!

The tulip vs nail head has to do with the underhead of the valve, the factory used a tulip...and the other manufactures as well as after market used the nail head. Less valve under head equal more bowl volume in a way and is lighter weight, just to start.