1.6 rockers with stock 318 cam??

You should ask IQ52, for those numbers it just makes sense to use something at 2'' or bigger...i would think much diff between the 1.78 and 1.88....its just +.050

Is this a maxed out version? IMO yes.

The runner is just smaller cast inside, the outside parameter is almost like a 360. same push rod location, divider wall, just more to grind out 'except the guide'. The main difference is the guide, floor, ssr.

318 port floors are flatter.

take a 340 and put a set heads on like IQ52's in his example...then snap the throttle and tell us what u think....that is if the port is still smaller..lol

I will do a thread with 2.02's put into the 675's i have in the thread and report back.
Thing to remember is that a ported 340/360 head has better low lift numbers still...so where do you really end up better?

btw, IQ52..what port volume do you end up with?

Sorry about being so late in reply 1w&cg.

Been real busy in the shop lately. Yes the valves in the 675 were larger than 2.00". As to port volume, never measured, never curious enough. I don't think you can get the port volume too large or a valve too big in that head to slow down a 318.