5.7L Hemi, 1968 Barracuda.. Opinions.

I agree with all the stuff Tin and Gary say about the Hemi, new tech, very reliable...

I will also say, that for me at least, if you want the full benefit of new tech in a motor, you gotta throw that carb in the trash (or set it on a shelf with your extended spring shackles) and use the EFI, the initial payout may be bigger, and the learning curve is steep, But, the payoff for fine-tuning, power, driveability, startup, EVERYTHING is HUGE.

I cant see the $ into a Hemi swap then just throwing a carb on top...

JOE

While its true that the current crop of carb intakes is not "ideal"...try telling a Drag pak owner that carb induction isn't value for $

Motor Details: Stock Short Block, Modern Cylinder Head ported 6.1 Heads, 358/240cfm @ .650 lift, Stock 2.08/1.58 Hollow Stem Valves, PAC Springs & related parts, Stock Rockers, Trend Pushrods, 5/16 x .080 wall, Performance Werks Racing Custom Hydraulic Roller to work with stock piston (no valve reliefs): 224/228 @ .050, .620/.640 lift , 112CL +2 , Drag Pack Intake, Proform HP950 Carb, Milodon Pan & Windage Tray, Firecore Prototype Coil Packs, 1 3/4 primary x 30” long dyno headers, ATI Drag Pack Damper, Meziere Remote Water Pump.

Dyno pulls were from 4500 to 6500 rpms.

Torque curve is very nice, starting at 472 ft. lbs. at 4540 rpm, peaking at 487 ft. lbs at 5258 rpm, then tapering off to 450.5 at 6454 rpm

Horse Power started at 408.1hp @ 4540 rpm & steadily climbing to a peak of 556.5 hp @ 6441 rpm.



FWIW - I'm happy to sacrifice 20ftlbs across the range for something I can tune in my own shed...I know what I'm doing with a carter carb, and something that is uncommon and more appealing to the eye.

And any myth about carb induction being inefficient is immediately dispelled by one view of HemiJoeJnrs car on you tube....

[ame="http://youtu.be/tb2xPxAkvs4"]302 Found[/ame]