Wait a minute, is the drift of this thread now swinging toward comparing owning and insuring a motor vehicle (a devise used in public daily, by a vast majority of the public) to mandating insurance on guns ( a device that is used by law abiding citizens under controlled conditions, ie: target shooting, or hunting, or in an emergency situation as a means of protection, or saving the life of a third party)?
I'm sorry, but that is an apples and oranges conversation. If you can not see that, I'm not going to spend the time to explain it.
The plain and simple truth of the matter is that the progressive Left is using this insurance argument as a means of usurping the Second Amendment.
No Other Purpose to the argument.
as I stated above: As a law abiding citizen it's no bodies business whether or not I own a gun. Not the neighbor's, not the cops, and certainly not the government's.