341 hemi in 1970 dart

No. He started with the 331 since it was well before the 392. You really should read his book. You might learn something. Not that solid? The 331 shares the same bore centers, water pump, timing cover, fuel pump, intake, valve covers, oil pan, intermediate shaft, lifters, timing chain, balancer, flywheel and I'm sure I am stopping short. It's a VERY solid link. Much the same as the low deck big block to the tall deck big block. You should learn more before spouting squirrel ****.

The 331 was the first engine Garlits ever used Nitro on. Read the book. That's all I can tell you. Your information is wrong. Did you even read the link I supplied? I could give you enough to read for the next solid year.

I'm pretty sure Big was referring to 392 cranks , which they used stock , welded and offset ground etc. etc. and had a lot of success with.
The soft crank / forged connection means what ?
Forging definitely provides a denser core , but it is the surface hardness that I am referring to.
The issue was caused by ( here is my best wild assed guess ) insufficient oiling , bearing materials that were 1952 quality , leading to material embedding in the crankshafts , resulting in trenches where there once was a well machined bearing surface.....because once they started to turn , they dug in and .......I am not shitting..........050" deep trenches on the rod journals.
If it was just one , I'd go " hmmmmmm" , if I had built them all , I'd go " aw , **** ". But it was on three of them.
And ( this was in the early 80's ) some of the old timers told me to expect a lot of this. I can't pin down a year , but the 354's ( 1956 ) seemed to be
when it became less of an issue.
Comparing a 331 to a 392 is like comparing peanuts to squirrel ****. There is a definite link , but it is not that solid.