Please discuss the following CL ad...curious as to what people here think

This car is grossly misrepresented. The tail lights and steering wheel are '74 items. Since the Cragars were offered in '65 as a factory option, they're original, right?

Besides the 73-74 thing, the rear axle claims are problematic. The rear wheels clearly use the 4-inch bolt pattern. For the car to be un-restored, the car must be an original drum brake six-cylinder car. The rear springs look the part of a /6. I don't have a reference point I can identify, but the axle tube looks small (2.75 in.). The 8.75 inch rear end uses a 3-inch tube. Further, the 8.75 was not offered on '74 models. The evidence points to this being a 7¼-inch rear end (8¼ uses a 3-inch tube). A 3.55:1, 7¼-inch would be a very rare animal indeed.

Caveat emptor! (Let the buyer beware. Latin)