1969 Dart GT 440 vs. 2010 Camaro SS/RS

oh brother.. you just don't get it..

no crap all those other makes have that. we are talking rear wheel muscle here..

like i said a dozen times here already. i don't see what the big deal is. the dart should have beaten the camaro. there is a serious issue if it didn't. and we don't even know how well that 440 even runs if it only beat a 14 second camaro... hell i know my lil 360 knocked quite a few big blocks off when i used to run it. big deal would have knocked off a new mustang,camaro and chally also in the quarter mile also. but it was still shitty in every other way ( except maybe for the corners)when comparing it with modern muscle. but saying i only have 17k into my car and the camaro cost 30+k is where it gets stupid. theres a reason it costs more, look how much more you get for that extra money.. you get a car light years better that does much more then go in a straight line. the camaro,mustang and challengers are all designed to do more then just go in a straight line.

maybe the camaro owner though his ***** was faster. i don't know.. i do know that a 440 dart should beat a stock camaro in a straight line. if not there's an issue. the other thing i know is that the camaro in the long run is a lot better rounded car. thats all i'm saying but for some reason your not under standing that.