worst motors of all time

If you knew what you were talking about, or do some research, you would find there was indeed a period of pinto engine failures due to a deletion of an oil passage to the valve train. This was a known shortcoming. and as for a 400 SBC I used to replace those junk engines around 50K - 60K because on the street the bores would go oval and cook rings from the uneven cooling. These were factory engines. No one had touched them. They might be fine in a race car that runs 18 seconds max, but a street car idling with steam holes for cooling between cylinders, what a stupid design!!! In the 70's you would be lucky to have any SBC run 100K. They would only make 70K in a pickup due to timing chain failure. I had so many 4 bolt main high nickel blocks with forged cranks, I would give them away.

What a steaming turd. News flash: I have driven a 400. It did NOT, repeat NOT overheat. This despite it being in one of the toughest applications to cool: a Chevy Vega with air conditioning. 95 degrees in traffic, A/C on...never went over 225 degrees. It went ~85K (45K in the Monte Carlo it came from, 40K in the Vega)...it came out for a rebuild when the car came totally apart for major upgrades. (Mostly: torque-arm rear suspension from a Monza.) Since then, it went ~150,000 miles. It came out this past winter...it was a bit tired, the car's owner wanted to do an LS engine swap, since the 400 couldn't be rebuilt (one rebore on a 400 is the limit).

The 400SB is hardly the only engine with siamesed bores! (For that matter...isn't the MP Hemi block a siamesed-bore design?)