NEW 2015 Challenger

318willrun said

Dodge dealer for a new Dart or mini van, I did not say go there to buy the Camaro or Stang. Anyways, I think the Challenger is better looking than both the Camaro and the 'Stang. I watched a brand new SS Camaro auto run at our dragstrip and it turned a 14.00 flat at 100 mph. No wheel spin either. So the E.T. was true, and I don't see how the Challenger R/T is inferior to that. So, if it isn't inferior in looks, 1/4 mile times, gas mileage, or interior room, then what??? 2k in pricing?? Anyways, kind of a pointless argument. Either ya like 'em or ya don't

Click to expand...

many ways. looks big time, performance, weight, quality, no rag top...etc..etc..etc. i've seen hemi cars go 14.5 in the quarter, have seen a srt challenger not get into the 13's. have also seen a basically stock standard r/t chally go low 13's, have seen stock mustangs go 12's. hell i've seen video and time slips of a v-6 mustang in the 13's and it was damn close to stock. i don't know what you saw in that camaro nor do i care because any number of things could have made it slow.. in my eyes the challenger is inferior just about every way imaginable. well maybe it has the most trunk space.. :)