How'd ya run against this???

Challengers were never all about 1/4 mile times. It was designed as a retro 1970, unlike the others. 2 out of three sold aren't Muscle cars, and they have a higher resale value than either Mustang or Camaro @ three years, averaging 60%. A few years ago at a show in Phoenix, I ran into a few Challenger owners showing their cars, and their wives Mustangs were nearby. I was interested in what they liked about both. The guy said if he was seriously drag racing, He drove the Mustang. if he wanted to go fast and travel any real distance, he drove the Challenger. They all agreed the mustang would require a trip to the chiropractor after any extended trip.Plus, his wife would have to bring a crow bar to pry him out of it, because of the cramped space. They were friendly, and loved both cars for what they were designed to do. I have driven the new Mustang, and there is no way I could get comfortable in it, let alone take a trip in the car. Chrysler knows who buys their cars, and they focus on them primarily. As far as being part of Fiat, Ford and GM shouldn't throw stones. GM's Design headquarters , and most of their profit comes from China. There are more than 24 recalls out right now for the Duramax truck line,and ford takes most of their profit to build plants in South America. Not to mention that sucky excuse for A Diesel truck (Ford)that you have to remove the cab from the frame just to service the engine! Neither are exactly the pillars of Patriotic America. They all Suck in their own way.:happy1: