Which of these cams would be better 416ci

Brian, Ted is right though you make a good point. I'll say your not 100% accurate on this rather than wrong because the stroke increase does indeed eat up more duration easier than a shorter stroke does. This the requirement of a larger cam for the stroker to perform the same outlet on a increased level vs. the shorter stroke cam in return per cam spec as in the effect it has on each engine.
(In how a big cam is radical on a 273 but tame on a 400+)

So, I a sense, I'm agreeing with you.

Danmax, considering you have a 3K converter and 3.55's, I myself would use the smaller cam listed above.

If you can order a custom cam from the company, asked them for a cam with more lift as to get the most from the Edelbrock heads and in the duration best suited for your driving and where you cruise at rpm wise. Also consider the use of 1.6 ratio rockers to get added lift that may not be available.

You didn't mention the size of the tire to be used. This has an effect.
I believe that the converter is more of a limiting factor over everything else.