altercation vs hemi denny

The one thing I like about the Alterktion is the shock towers. Bill's setup uses a fabricated shock tower that is welded to the K member thus taking all the stress off of the inner fender. To me this seems to be the best setup structurally.

The inner fenders were never designed to carry the weight of the car. The Alterkation deals with this with their fabricated shock towers. Hemi Denny uses a bracket to reinforce the shock mount area. Both work. Bill's setup though has longevity on its side. He's been selling his setup for over a decade, Hemi Denny for a few years.

I've been researching and building my car for almost a decade and I can say I've never heard a negative word regarding the Alterktion [other than the fact that its so darn expensive and people are upset that they can't afford it. ;) ]

What changes would I make to Bill's or Denny's setups?

Well for Bill's I'd love to see Chrylsler spindles. I know that there are more brake setups for pinto front ends, but I'd like to keep stock brakes as an option to help keep the cost down. Also I'd like to see him use tie rod ends and bushings in a few places that he uses heim joints. [Both of these might be impossible for various reasons that only Bill could explain. Remember people, engineering is all about trade offs]

For Denny's I'd like to see a better solution for the upper shock mount.

What will I choose? Unfortunately I am keeping the stock setup as I simply can't afford either setup.

Regards,

Joe Dokes