Looking for a fight or just being an ***? I don't need to post such a thing as the author of the test you posted said just that. If you have a problem with that statement, then take it up with the author of the study you posted and not me. Don't just look at the page you posted, but read his own comments on the forum in which he posted it.
He's the one who said his own testing is subjective. If you're using it as scientific proof, then that's your problem, since the author of the study says it isn't.
The issue, seems to me, is that you're defending Fram against the naysayers. Again, it's subjective. You like Fram. Other guys don't. Don't like that, take it up with them, as I haven't said one word or the other about Fram filters. You'll also notice I haven't said what I personally use, just what I recommend as a good filter for the value.