340 dyno chart thoughts
in my opinion the cam is over advanced (just my 2 cents)
The timing.
Better chamber with a good dynamic should not want 37 degrees or even 35...Problem IS he only has around 155 ish cranking dynamic with that int close @ 66.
This thread though, I must has say again has me laughing at the responses up until the bsfc came out on paper, then it was " should be a great street motor" "it will still run 12's" lmao.... and the last but not least......the head flow numbers, the real reason...
they did about nothing to them that was good for what this guy is doing. The motor is still decent...but one of two if not both things could been done to give this guy bang for his buck, and that is...
THE CAM LIFT IS **** FOR THOSE HEADS, MORE LIFT!
THOSE HEADS ARE DOWN 20 CFM FROM .200-.400FROM WHERE THEY SHOULD BE WHOEVER DID THEM DIDN'T GIVE A ****.
A lot of people were counting on or assuming they flowed well, well they do...above .500! OR OUT OF THE CAM RANGE...So start adding the number by 2 from .380 lift and it all becomes clearer.