The other thing is the NWT. When compared to the Textus Receptus, it is wrong on many levels. Don't know who the "scholars" are you are saying the NWT is the most accurate bible, but it isn't.
The FACT is the Protestant reformation was founded on the Textus Receptus, which is where the KJV of the bible comes from. It doesn't matter what language it's published in, it reads the same. Huss used the TR, so did Luther and the rest of the reformation.
It's not wonder so many people have no interest in the stuff. First, they don't want to do the work. The second issue is we all have to read from the same book. We don't need any other translations. You can only dumb down the Scriptures so much before you dumb down the reader. BTW, the KJV of the bible is considered one the BEST works of English literature there is.
And last, we need way less college educated, seminary indoctrinated fools in the pulpits. Most people I know won't question a seminary fool on anything. Read for yourself.
One last thing. I have maybe, MAYBE and 9th grade education. I can understand the KJV of the bible. I don't need a college educated, seminary indoctrinated knave to read plain English to me.
The most simple way to weed out the posers is read the prophecies and then compare them to what your denomination reached. There is no seven years of tribulation, no rapture none of that crapola. If they can't get that right, what else do they get wrong?