A different Q on 340 Vs 416

Having driven an Eddie-headed 367 since 2004, with a 230* cam and 10.9Scr, as you can see I'm in no hurry to change it. It goes 93 in the 1/8' with no tuning and a 2.4+ 60ft; at 3467# wet and race ready, for the one and only successful run, it ever made . Fun as heck with a 4 speed and a 10.97 starter gear. That would be similar to a hi-comp 340 with a 2.45 low,that frisky TC, and probably 3.73s.
I also like it cuz it's a jump-in-and-go anywhere/anytime, almost zero maintenance, combo.
Whatever you decide,
Happy Hotrodding.

Oh;
At your 3185 weight, that 340 could be built with a smaller cam to rival the low-rpm performance of my 367 which is 3650 me in it, in street trim. As A streeter, I have run just about every gear from 2.76s to 4.88s behind that engine, and I can tell you that I think just enough gear to initiate tirespin is where I like to be; then let the torque do the rest. I'm not the rev-it up-and slip-it-out kindof guy, to get moving. Oh sure once underway I like to hear 7000 for 5 or 6 seconds, and then it's shut-down time cuz the 367 is probably speeding, and AJ don't get speeding tickets in this car, not since.... ever.
That is certainly worth considering,,i know what you mean with just enough gear,thats actualy a very good description how the old combo worked,it was just barely making fuzzy marks on the street if i stabbed the throtle from a standstill on a good stretch of road but would not break lose completely.


Both engines probably make around 1.15 lbs-ft per cid 345 = 397 lbs-ft and a 416 = 478 lbs-ft. Now times it by 1st gear and rear gear and you get. 345 cid, 2.45 x 3.91 x 397 = 3803 lbs-ft to the tires vs 416 cid, 2.45 x 3.21 x 478 = 3759 lbs-ft to the tires. You were right in the begining both combos would be similar.
That is some good calculations right there showing what i suspected, so i suspect the stroker with taller gears should be happier since the converter will be less wrong so to speak?