Back to the drawing board... stock low dollar 360

IMO the reason to use two different springs is to get an advance with changing resistance to rpm.
At this point I've lost track of which engine this is for! LOL.
But if your curious how this plays out to a 318 with fairly stock cam and good low rpm combustion rates, touched on that here:
1970 Dodge Dart 318 Distributor

273 Hi Perf package is a good example of a timing curve for a burn that needs a bit more spark lead in the lower rpms.
View attachment 1715247536
In both cases, its better to have the long secondary curve into the rpms, especially with electronic ignition.

All of these are designed with vacuum advance in mind.
I agree. I was setting it up for the 360. I tried it in the 318 for convenience. I do not run a vacuum advance on either motor. Timing mark would not stay still at idle, jumping around about 10*. When I revved it to full advance, it would hit full advance and then back off about 10*. LOL...