Stroker intake question and guidance, mainly guidance.

JBurch said
My vote is single plane.........the argument of giving up bottom end cracks me up; what are you calling "bottom end"??.....what kind of a torque curve are you thinking about......electric motor style that has max torque at zero rpm?? Too much "bottom end" is hard to lay down in a corner, you break the tires loose, you could end up loop-de-loop and they don't have a lot of guard rails out there and canyon walls are very unforgiving.

For the record, my 360 has an M1, 557 cam with 1.6 rockers, Hughes fully ported Eddies and I never felt I was lacking 'bottom end", at times I thought about killing some of what I had so I could hook better.

A few members who have run the two intakes in 4.00 arm strokers at the track would disagree with you. Oddly enough with the cam size he has, the rpm was quicker. Though I can agree that a single plane wouldn’t be a deal killer.

j par said
Dual quad tunnel ram! LOL you can see the bottom of your intake valve before you set your carbs on...:popcorn:

Like these? LOL!