Cam selection for 5.9 mag

Ok, I know this has been beat to death, and I should have all the answers by now after reading all the other threads, but sometimes i'm a little dense and it takes a bit to sink in.

Looking to do a cam change, not right away but in the near future. I'd like opinions on a couple of specific Lunati Voodoo cams, cause I found a smoking deal online for these two cams.

My current setup:
'99 5.9 Magnum - carbed. in a '68 Dart
stock bottom end
stock replacement 5.2 cam (184/193 @.050, lift is .412 - .428 with 1.6 rockers) 112 lsa.
Edelbrock airgap, with 1406 carb.
Stock magnum heads with mild home porting job.
904 auto stock converter
3:23 gears and 25.5" rear tires.
I am at 5300' elevation.
Usage is cruising, occasional drive to work, and maybe twice a year to the strip.

Soon switching to 3:55 gears and doing a A500 tranny swap, which will give me a factory high stall converter. Hard to find an exact number on what that stall is, but a replacement from advance auto says 1900-2400 stall.

Interested in going with either one of these two Lunati Voodoo hydraulic rollers, basically cause I found a smokin' deal on them. Great deal on the smaller one, and good deal on the bigger. I tend to be conservative on my choices, but want the car to pull hard at more than just the bottom end. These are the two i'm looking at:

Lunati Voodoo 20200714 (207/213 at .050 .513 - .513 lift with 1.6 rockers, 112 lsa) operating range 1000 - 5000 rpm.

Lunati Voodoo 20200715 (213/219 at .050 .513 - .513 lift with 1.6 rockers, 112 lsa) operating range 1200 - 5500 rpm.

Just wondering which is the better choice, keep in mind my 5300' elevation, so compression is no doubt lower than at sea level. probably in the 8.5 to 1 range. So wondering if the bigger cam will hurt more than help because of my high altitude. Also wondering if the small er cam is enough of a change from the stock 5.2 cam to make it worth doing.
I realize either choice will require springs - retainers.

I have to agree with Rumblefish on this, and I'll tell you why.
Oregon Cams 214/224 and .512 with 1.6 rockers and 110 lsa.
I can barely tell it's anything other than stock, but it was a case of being careful not to go too far and trash fuel economy.
Tuning real lean on the idle gives it a light lope at stoplights.
The 213/219 on a 112 I'd bet it'd be milder, because I have almost that exact motor, carb and all.

It runs great and with the A500 will do 100 all day long without even breathing and get in the mid 20's mpg, but you almost can't tell it's anything more than stock at 15:1 AFR idle.
If you want some cam sound to it go higher in the duration's and shorter lsa.

Just my two cents from experience with the same combo. (and elevation actually)
When I drive down to Phoenix it picks up a little meaner in sound and power both, because it's a couple of thousand feet lower.
Down there it also raises my idle and running AFR both 1 full point or so leaner.