Hotchkis TVS with QA1 lower control arms

I’ve spoke to QA1 about this. Without getting into details, I’d bet they are working on this now. Nublu argued with me over and over saying the tabs were in the 73 and up spot. They aren’t. I went through this on a customers car. Unlike many internet people, I don’t speak unless I have a valid reason to back it up. I’ve had early and late sway bars and lower arms all at the same time on the same car to determine this. The bottom line with QA 1 - IF you have a 72 and down k and their arms there is NO bolt in solution.

Say what now?
screen-shot-2020-03-05-at-3-50-51-pm-png.png

The QA1 LCA tab is what, within a 1/4" of that stock 73+ LCA tab on the longitudinal plane? And within an 1" or so on the vertical plane? The vertical plane is an easy fix, it's just a shorter end link.

My '74. With a Hellwig bar that uses the stock 73+ mounts.
IMG_4373.jpeg

My '74 again. Same sway bar, but with QA1 LCA's. You can see the end link is shorter, and there is a slight angle change on the endlink. Well within functional, and probably no more than you'd get with the factory tolerances anyway.
IMG_4412.jpeg

The only argument here is if the Hotchkis 67-72 sway bar works with the 73+ tabs. Here's a nice clear picture of the '67-72 Hotchkis bar. This is from this article on an '69 Valiant suspension upgrade Complete Suspension Upgrade on a 1969 Plymouth Valiant - Car Craft Magazine - Hot Rod

It's not the exact same picture, but you can clearly see the relation between the LCA tab used here and the strut rod is almost identical to the 73+ location, and therefore quite similar to the QA1 location as well. The strut rods are in the same location for the whole 67-76 run. I have the Hotchkis 67-72 bar for my '71 GT, I've been through the instructions and their description of the mounting tab location is basically identical to the 73+ tab location. Hopefully @drewmac will put this to rest once and for all.