Lunati Hydraulic FT Cam users..........

Without changing anything else, I’d say that’s a tall order.

None of parts work alone...... they all interact with the rest of the car.

A cam that could ultimately be worth .25...... with different gears and converter...... might not be worth anything without those other changes.

And, the cam that works with the stock converter and 2.94’s(like the one in the motor now), could easily end up being something that’s holding you back when your looking for a way to get those last couple of tenths.

I’m not the master of the ultra mild combo.

When I’m working to get a combo to a certain ET goal...... I think of it as the entire combo...... not the individual pieces.

The cam/converter/carb/gears really need to all be on the same page.

I’ll add this...... I’d do the gears/sure grip/converter all at once...... before the cam.
which is kind of my point. We all know a big, aggressive cam backed by 4.56's and a 8" converter would rock the ship, and it's also everything I don't want. So, with many saying I need a solid cam and like J par just posted "my current cam makes him want to take a nap", nobody really knows if even the milder Lunati 702 would get me the gain I want for my car. Without knowing the answer, how can anyone "know" it has to be a solid cam? Only that they "make more power" - but how much power? Do I need that extra 80 hp they talked about in the article to get my 2.5 tenths?? If so, I'm big doo doo... lol