Piston question

AJ/FormS said
Because
#1 he recommended low compression.
#2 because he is willing to go .060, and did I miss that he sonic-checked it? LAs are "lightweight A engines" for a reason, not all will successfully take .060..
#3 Machine work already done to the block?
the "bore-ability" should have been the first thing to be checked, and no machine work started until it was known that whatever size decided on, would work. Now, you are stuck between a rock and a hard place. I mean I really hope it works out for you, But from where I'm standing right now, I would be very uncomfortable.
#4

Ok well first off he didnt recommend low compression pistons. He just said he dont like kb and he would rather run a factory replacement piston than a kb. It's not like that.
2 yes it was sonic checked and he said the walls are have plenty of material there
3 yes he bored it over to 40 and it didnt get all the ring ridge out that's why I'm in the situation I'm in.
4 thanks for your opinion but I respectfully disagree. I think he has and is doing a fantastic job before I started this journey I called at least 6 machinist and none of them even had time to talk to me on the phone when they found out I wasn't building a 15k race engine. This guy not only took on the business but has helped me tremendously along the way.
While we're here. I done some research on quench last night. And for a street engine with steel rods up to 6000 rpm they recommend .038-.043 quench. With the kbs and a 1121 head gasket
(
(Kbs are .012 under the deck and a .028 gasket) that will put me at .040. So I'm in that quench range. Why is quench unobtainable with flat top pistons seems to me I would be there?