Big horsepower 318 builds
No arguing, just saying dyno numbers don't always tell the truth. How many times have you seen a guy post big dyno numbers and the car never comes close to backing the numbers up? There was an engine builder on this site that was always posting small blocks that made stupid power and yet none of them backed it up.
What I'm calling bull **** on is all the blowing you do.
Anytime anyone questions anything you post you go into little girl mode and the name calling starts, you've done it over, and over, and over and ............
Do you know how many times I’ve been told my flow bench and dyno numbers are lies because the car doesn’t run what it should? Many, many times.
So you go to the track and watch the junk **** make a pass. The converter is wrong, not nearly enough gear, worn out tires, the car has never been on a scale, let alone corner scales, shocks I wouldn’t use on station wagon, front end tied down so the driver can “cut a light”, wheelie bars too low, ladder bars (if you can’t hook with a cal Trac type of bar you need a 4 link, of course the morons don’t want to learn a 4 link so the ignorance inertia goes forward), wheelie bars too high, IC set by the ladder bars or on a 4 link set by some magic percentage of the wheel base, can’t read a plug or use a timing light...
It goes on and on and on. So the time slips are NOT evident of much anything except can the tuner tune. Most times, the answer is no. So the dyno numbers aren’t wrong, it’s the junk car and/or ignorant tuner. But they dyno numbers take the fall for stupid.
As for the rest of your whittle little post, you didn’t question ****. How can you? I haven’t posted ANY numbers yet, but your mouth is on full blast. You are running your sewer about something that hasn’t even happened yet.
And you try and claim the high road. You can critique the dyno numbers AFTER they are posted not before. Do you see how idiotic you are being?
Grow up and act like a 59 year old man who actually has been to a track once or twice.