Dialing in a Carter AVS

transfer slot sync... (keep in mind the following information is with the 4966s carb)
You are correct that a Carter idle system has a couple important differences from the Holley system. (Discussed here:Operational theory of the Carter idle restricions & air bleeds)


I have been playing around with the timing as well. It idles best around 18 deg BTDC, right now it is at 14 deg BTDC. I had it as low as 10 deg BTDC, but it did not like that at all. The take off at idle is a lot smoother at 18, 14 is okay, at 10 it is jerky. The temperature would start to creep up at idle when the initial was set to 10, it doesnt go up as much when the idle was set at 14, but would idle all day long at 18 with no issue. I get my best vacuum readings at idle when the timing is set at 18 deg (hovering around 14 inHg), were at 10 deg I was getting 11-12 inHg. A lot more of the transfer slot has to be exposed for it to want to idle around 800 rpm at 10 BTDC than at 14 and 18 deg BTDC. Regardless of timing, the idle speed screw is almost maxed out (as in screwed in far enough to almost make the spring go solid) to keep the idle speed around 800. So my thought process was if that much of the transfer slot needed to be exposed, it wants more fuel.
Excellent approach.
A couple tips.
* Always note the rpm of the initial. Some distributors will already be advancing at the 'idle' or initial setting. The result is that its not actually the base or initial timing. Instead its base timing plus the degrees advanced at that rpm.
* Best manifold vacuum in neutral (park) is slightly misleading because there is no load on the engine. Go for best vacuum in drive (for a given rpm). In general this will be a 1/8 turn richer on the idle mix screws, and may also be a little less timing.


I just assumed it was running lean due to the eyes burning because I thought rich it would be smoking a bit out the tail pipe? It is running the stock cast iron 4 barrel intake, stock exhaust manifolds and comp cams part number 21-224-4 (grind number XE274H-10). So since this would be a little hotter than the HP engine I figured it would need the .101 jets with the .065x.062x.053, but instead it has the .089 jets (the one the 4966s carb was to have) with rods that measure .0675x.064x.058. Those parts make it appear it is running lean, correct?
OK. Lets seperate this out.
Burning eyes can be a mix of unburned hydrocarbons so yes it may be lean at idle.
The rod jet restriction is much larger than the idle resitriction. Significantly larger so it should have no effect on idle mix.

The rods and jetting will only need changing if the velocity of the air past the boosters at a given rpm changes signifcantly. In relation to cam change, this will happen if the volumetric efficiency changes noticibly. I wouldn't try to guess that. Drive it and change the rods as needed for better milage, and better quarter mile mph.

One caveat. I haven't looked up that carb number, but Chrysler carbs from around '68 to '71 or so that were for CAP/CAS engines were set up to run relatively lean idle mixes. This was for reduced CO and HC emissions and only worked when combined with the original everything. With the increased overlap in the cam, a lean idle carb needs to be reworked some. For strong idle with a fully warmed up engine, idle mix will need to be down around 13:1 to be strong.