Dyno testing a stock(?) 1972 440

Well, I'd love to build one with a lot of compression. I cannot afford it. I am glad that you are fortunate enough to do it. I'll just stay like a broke *** 17 year old kid. Thanks for the insult yet again. It seems all you're good at.


That wasn’t an insult. Explain to me how much more money it is to build a 10.5:1 engine as opposed to the same engine at 8.5:1 because I’d like to see it.

I just did a very mild 340 with a measured 10.28:1 compression ratio. Nothing trick and it’s will run on 87 pretty easy, but I don’t like doing it.

It would have been the same money to do less compression, and it wouldn’t run early as well.