I have already said that, but other than Pittsburgh racer, no one has
Provided any technical reasons why, only what everyone is using.
And no one has disputed the realistic cost issue of fully utilizing the main asset of the 9 inch which is its drop out centre section.
I believe one of the major mags did a direct comparison of the 9 inch, the 12 bolt ,and the Dana. The Ford absorbed the most horsepower,
The Dana and the 12 bolt were a dead heat. They also took out all the variables for weight, and concluded that factoring in variations
In brake weight, and axle weight etc, the Danas excess weight is exaggerated. I have never disputed the popularity of the Ford, and it s aftermarket support. I am only ( with supporting info) saying that
That style or design of axle is inherently weaker and less rigid and costs more $$ to utilize its main features. A rear axle does not know whether it's under a bracket car or a super stock car. It can handle the torque thrown at it or it can't.
What I don't get with this thread is that some are saying the Ford is stronger than a Dana, never was. 9 3/4 ring gear is king.
