I could but I enjoy problem solving these types of things. Also, after doing some research it seems the 3.79" is a better combo due to it's ideal rod ratio.
A lot of people agree with you on this. The problems arise when people want a specific part or cubic inch displacement. The rate is saying, “I have a 4.0 crank” or a 408/416...
For very high performance and race builds, I would rather a sub 4.00 crank throw on a 4.10 bore (or bigger) type of combo.
This is just me. Others here have done VERY well with the 4.0 arm crank.