My point wasn't about dyno or ET times for the sake of racing or performance. Dyno and ET don't mean racing; they are scientific, mathematical methods to measure what part combinations/tuning do to an engine/car. I don't have a dyno, so when I make changes to components or tuning and want to more accurately gauge results, I have a stretch of road out in the boonies marked off at 60 ft., 1/8 mile, and 1/4 mile, etc. to give me different ETs. Atmospheric and road conditions will obviously impact that ET some, but it's a far better gauge than seat of the pants speculation and cheaper than paying for hundreds of dyno runs. When strangers on a public forum make claims about how changing parts leads to gains, if they don't have some form of scientific measurement as baselines of comparison, even if crude like my marked off road, it is conjecture/opinion. I examine and research it as such in an attempt to back it up with articles/publications/threads that in fact include scientific measurements before I jump on board. Just as I have not supplied scientific data to back up my claim that the OP's 360 combo on a 318 will harm it more than benefit it (I've never done such a swap because the scientific evidence I have found says it's a bad idea), I would expect others to look for articles about building 318s and about putting 360 parts on a 318 before trusting my advice.