Question on port matching

rumblefish360 said

You know this, I know this, Larry Meaux knows this, I’m sure a slew of top notch people in the field know this. They pass this information down into the hands of the people so they now know this, why RB can not properly plain his position against this is beyond me.

I started to go through everything he said to make a huge long post but grew tired of talking with a wall and have decided to throw in the towel on this subject.

If anybody thinks that a larger intake port up against a smaller cylinder head port is better (LMMFAO&HARD!)
Please do so have at it and if you could, prove RB correct, please do so school me. I’ll only say if it is not on a MoPar engine, then I REALLY DGAF.

MoPar only her peoples!

Have a great one everybody!

Click to expand...

By the way, since you are humping this so hard, I want you to point out where I said to deliberately make the manifold bigger. Go ahead. You won’t find it. Again, your limited experience and inability to learn are handicapping you. Yet you have no issue calling you don’t know and you DGAF but you certainly get your 2 cents in.

One more time. Never ever make the manifold smaller than the port in the head. Ever. If, again IF you have core shift or some reason you can’t match the port, make the manifold bigger than the head.

And, do NOT make a bulge in the port at the flange. That is what I have said from the beginning.

Don’t do all the mental gymnastics to think that a smaller intake port has anti reversion capabilities because it doesn’t. Not even a little. If you did some basic study you’d already know that. Hysteric thinks it does, but he thinks a lot of things that are wrong.