Question on port matching

rumblefish360 said

@Rat Bastid

What is the current parts being used and there level of miss match?

I called into question the amount of miss match.

I asked how much miss match is acceptable and it took you several days to answer. It seems Darin is OK with double your amount. Perhaps you should tell Darin to stand in front of a flow bench. Sucks for you being correct all the time huh?

Perhaps I’ll do a video on what I was referencing and about the port miss match so I can walk you through it. It might be needed since you can’t seem to comprehend what your reading.

You make arguments where they don’t exist and dream up other things that don’t belong.

Click to expand...

You’re kidding right? I already answered that 12 times. The answer is (and it’s the answer you don’t want because you can’t support your position) you don’t want ANY mismatch. Of course that is in the context of THIS thread and the question the OP asked. It has nothing to do with big block chevies or 351C engines that have a huge, slow intake port. The OP doesn’t have that.

I can’t make it any more simple than that. No mismatch is the goal. Sometimes the real world gets in the way of that. In that case, and in the case of the subject of THIS thread if you have to have a mismatch, make the port in the manifold bigger, not the other way around.

There you go. Argue away, but you’ll still be wrong, and you are edging towards being a lying troll like Hysteric. Tread lightly lest you go full lying troll.