I wouldn't believe it if I hadn't seen it !

It’s only a controversy because you want it to be. Again, your friend is full of ****. And YOU a bought it. That’s not my problem.
I didn't completely buy it, I merely repeated something I was told, especially the part about it being that old as electronic ign wasn't till 72 ?? And yes, I got a thrill out of it.
I will be sure in the future to post something that is truly controversial, like the thread I started about what exactly the specs were on the 340 1968 manual trans camshaft
I posted the specs directly from the 1976 Direct Connection Racing Manual and it started a **** storm. Look it up