360 stroker how much HP is picked up if everything else stays the same?

And that’s what wrong with those tests. Who build a 360 with the same cam as a 408?
Well, I guess if one wanted to pick the pepper out of the fly poop, you could have a felid day. But the test was pretty basic in the way they laid it out. Everything the same except displacement. FWIW, no matter how you slice it, that cam is lame. I wondered about the cam itself and just for ***** and giggles, I installed in a 10.5-1, Edelbrock top end w/a 750, 340@030 over.
Crap 1-5/8 headers that are normally reserved for the break in engine stand.
The one thing I did was order it on a 108 instead of the 110. I have to say that it lacks torque and is the normal crappy lower end. I’d imagine the 110 would be a good few ft. lbs. less making it shittier. Still a fun engine that deserves a little silver star for effort. Better headers and a extension on the end would help a lot!
I would have built the 360 to rpm as ignition as it could without cam timing that killed the bottom too bad.
Rephrase please


RPM is what makes the difference. They know this on that show, but it doesn’t fit the magazine narrative of dual plane intakes, split pattern cams and wide lobe centers.
As with all things, they have there place & I’d hope, a very good reason why that path was taken.