500hp & 600hp Bench Racing thread

Changing displacement is s huge change, is keeping thing else the same is that a fair comparison.

Take gearing eg.. say I build a 400 hp 273 and you build a 400 hp 440 would it be a fair comparison to have both run 2800 stall & 3.23 gears yes with that restriction the 2800 stall & 3.23 gears would be more optimal for the 440 but if both geared and stalled right it should be a close match on the track, wouldn't that be the same for everything else.




My conception of how this all works seem to go against the grain only say 10% seem to be on my page, I am willing to change my mind but I need more than cause we say so, majority rules etc..

If you asked me explain how 408 makes more torque than a 365 I could answer in one sentence, why isn't there a sentence to explain why a 365 can't make as much power as a 408 with same/similar parts funny thing is the answer I mainly get is the torque answer.
You are talking about 43 less cubes. Your problem is your thought seems to be that similar top ends should make similar power on a 408 or 365. When someone starts to explain why they don't you ramble on about how the smaller motor shoulda coulda woulda if the ports were different and the cam timing is changed. That's not a comparison. Define the parameters that you feel should differ between the two engines to make them make the same or similar power and maybe someone can agree or disagree from there. This is a go nowhere endeavor until you acknowledge that you are in it for the debate/entertainment rather than the education.