No, I mean tests. Valid tests.....
And even if a magazine [ or any other entity ] presented the test results, why would it matter if the object of the test was to show how LSA changes power, by having identical cams ground, changing only the LSA.
You think that just changing the LSA and running a test is valid? You think that that some how proves something to be able to make blanket statements like 106 is better than 114?
There are far too many variables in a running engine to make blanket statements like a tight LSA always makes more power, what if the Duration. Lift. ICL or any other metric isn't ideal to begin with..............
Maybe the Prostock guys need to get Vizard on board because they have no idea on this stuff nor do guys like Mike Jones and Harold Berkshire who grind them for them on 118 LSA's