318 MAX fuel economy builds?

Actually the coking was fuel that was being almost consumed in the plenum.
Can you explain how the fuel was being consumed. "Consumed" implies being burned if that was the case the engine would have detonated itself to death and yet its still ran right?

Consumption takes place in the cylinder not the manifold. Your claim doesn't add up.



Yeah read this even closer from Greg K.

Vacuum in an engine occurs at many places,including valve areas,ports, carb drillings, cylinders etc..an engine uses vacuum to lower the boiling points of fuel molecules which in turn assists cylinders to create a pressure on the crank.
Vaporisation is the key to making power,smooth power,a pressure curve that has some grunt to it.
When you modify an engine you are at risk of generally drastically reducing the cylinders ability to vaporise the mixture,especially at the lower rpm levels of the engines operation.When you have this condition occurring it forces you to calibrate the carby and ignition to a compromise which in turn decreases the cylinders ability of getting to full power quickly when you WOT the carby.
When you increase the manifold vacuum you raise the vaporisation of the fuel mixture prior to entering the cylinders, its important to realise the importance of this.When you have a greater amount of fuel mix that is vaporised before the entry of the cylinders you end up with a more homogenous mix in the cylinder prior to ignition time,its very important to understand the need for this.

I can post many many more quotes from both Greg and Bruce from the the 3 forums that they were kind enough to explain this stuff on. I have saved every statement Bruce and Greg made concerning Carbs and Engines. That's a lot of info to correlate into a cohesive understanding of how this stuff works.

This is what Greg K said concerning Bruce's Carb when they swapped if for a well tuned Holley. What did Bruce's Carb do to allow that I wonder.....

both are at WOT.
both venturis are on the same side of the engine.
with the holley the combustion on that side is upsetting the flow out of the holley booster.
on the smartcarby it is not.
with the smartcarby the combustion changed dramatically.

Did you read this?

30+ years ago I built a 360 using 318 cam, 318 open chamber heads (because the 302's weren't out yet), 318 intake & carb, and 318 exhaust manifolds. It was a 0.030" overbore using 1971 flat top pistons (no dish). As I recall, it ended up with a 10.8:1 static compression ratio. It was installed in a 1974 W-150 pick-up. It got 23-24 MPG HWY, and could pull a house on 87 octane fuel (quote from the truck owner).
3) Cylinder heads:
- Higher port velocities = higher efficiencies (BSFC). This has been extensively covered by the likes of David Vizard, Larry Widmer-TheOldOne, and numerous others. It isn't just port size, but eliminating dead zones where fuel can fall out of suspension.

Mike must have just gotten lucky with his engine not coking up.........Don't let the "higher" port velocities trigger you though.

Cant wait for "that's not what im saying" routine.......