FBO's black HEI ignition box

Bill,

I would only advocate bigger plug gaps, & always have, like 060 with a powerful ign system like HEI. Would not recommend it for stock Mopar system, never have.



If I am reading your post correctly, the engine that got smaller plug gaps was turboed. Not surprised at all it misfired with large plug gaps. Pretty sure I said earlier in this thread [ could have been another thread ] that bigger gaps like 060 are for NA engines. Non - NA such as turbo, blown, nitrous are likely to misfire with 060 gaps HEI.
The benefits of bigger plug gaps may not be felt or measured at higher/peak rpms but are often felt at rpms other than peak. People with thick heads do not understand this. Comments like 'Increased the plug gap & engine runs smoother'. That means it is misfiring less & making more HP, but only felt at cruising RPM.
No, my 2.4L is not turbo. Those were the SRT engines (Neon and PT Cruiser). Boost from a turbo increases cylinder pressure, which makes it harder for a spark to jump. I recall an article ~15 years ago where Ford was planning a head gasket which would serve double-duty as the spark plug, throwing the spark across the entire cylinder. Never heard why it was dropped, but can imagine long-term issues even if they could get it to work at low rpm w/ high throttle. Hopefully, they would have at least tapped a hole for a spark plug (plugged it) as a fall-back position for recalls.