David Vizard, Uncle Tony's garage, Unity motorsport. Mission impossible Dodge 302 Head porting

Cudafever said
This is just what i think it should be. We all have are own thoughts on it. some vary passionate.

It should be what you could get in that time frame, but break the rules, a little, with today tech. Such As, small stem LS valve.....that's ok, grind crank to stroke (sort of) it... that's OK........they were doing that in the day. Lighter piston of today......they have to be replaces sooooo OK. Grinding on the rod, over a much cheaper lighter and stronger rod???? Well, that is what they would have done in the day.
Using a 340/360 head????/ i say NO! with the 4 barrel Intake YES! It was available in 72. ( I personally think that they should use the 72 and older head and intakes) Not because the 302 head is aka a I/M head but because it hadn't been designed in 72) Exhaust manifolds????? you could get header for them back in the day......but once again......not with the 2 barrel.

OK, there is my 2 Point-five sense worth of a opinion. :elmer: :lol:

I think this build has become can they make that intake and carb make 325 hp, cause rest is no problem, the heads are good for 400 plus hp now, they can get cr ethier through machining everything or aftermarket pistons, should be able to regrind a fairly aggressive cam, exhaust manifolds not ideal but 325 hp ain't pushing the limits. So that basically leaves the intake which I don't overly care if it can,
I hope they at least test it with 4 bbl and headers also.