Let’s just say I think I tested the poorest flowing port on the intake (one of two) so yes I think it would help to square it off. After I get paid I may if I have time flow one of the rear ports to see how it stacks up. We have to look at this whole test as one that is really pushing the boundaries of this intake and I think it handled the test well. How many guys do you know that would pick this intake for a set of heads flowing 308 cfm. I think it would really shine on a head flowing 280-290cfm. After I flow tested it I started looking at the sharp edge on the adapter face and as a carb would centralize the airflow more towards the center of the intake took some duck-sil and roll out a nice bead to put a radius on top the spacer. It kicked the mid lift numbers up approximately 2 cfm.