340 .040 Bore Okay?

I have sonic tested many blocks over the years. The only and by only I mean ONLY consistent factor is the inconsistency of these blocks.

I have never even a correlation between casting numbs like that and lower series of numbers being better. Not once.

Since I did the testing myself, I call BULLshit on all of that.

And I did enough of them to see a trend if there was one.


EDIT: the only caveat to that is the early 360 blocks that were poured from 340 tooling. And I say you still sonic test everything because Chrysler was never perfect about stuff like that. That’s how you can have an early 72 model year Demon with a complete 68-71 340 in it. BTDT
Evidently You never compared the the numbers with the casting flaws. The 340-1's are a much cleaner casting. And no porosity at all. I remember seeing some of your work. It really wouldn't matter what the block looks like once you have your hands in it.